Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Assignment 9A: Testing the Hypothesis, Part 2

·        WHO:
o   I would say that the group that would fall outside of my market boundary would be people who do not have food allergies or sensitivities or a family history of food allergies. I interviewed three people of this nature and they felt as though it was a good idea for people who were beginning to display symptoms. The three believed that since they did not have a history of this issue that they would not be affected in the future and there would not need to take a food allergy test.
o   Interviewee number four was a father of two younger children, aged 3 and 7. He mentioned that maybe children under the age of 5 should not take these tests. In his opinion, they are still too young and developing at a rapid rate and their sensitivities could be all over the place. He thinks it should be an option for older children maybe starting in second or third grade.
o   Another person I interviewed, age 40, mentioned that she would probably cap the age around 30. She felt as though 30 was young enough and that after that age any dietary changes might be rare. (She has no medical background, though)
·        WHAT:
o   Interviewee number four did bring up a good point by saying that our bodies change as we age and that can impact our stomachs. Although this solution can provide insight and a means to become prepared, it will not stop the body from growing and developing.
§  For example, when my mom was in grade school she was very allergic to chocolate and she could eat as many mangos as she wanted. Suddenly, things changed in high school and she became very allergic to mangos and now she can eat chocolate. Over the past few years her allergy to mangos has worsened and cannot even touch them.
o   Who is to say that this will not happen to someone and their sensitivities/allergies bounce around all over the place. It would be hard to make them take a food allergy test every time they developed a new allergy.
·        WHY:

o   I do not think that outsider’s need is different; I think it just depends on whether the person is interested in the topic of food sensitivities or not. By saying this I mean that this would be similar a flu shot. It would be used for preventative measures; however, some people do not get a flu shot because they have never gotten the flu before or because they do not think that the shot will protect them. The same could said for the outsiders of this product. They could think because they are too old, do not have any symptoms or a history that the product would not be beneficial to them. They may have a need in the future if their assumptions prove wrong.





 Inside the Boundary
 Outside the Boundary
 Who
 Ages 6-30
 People with allergy/sensitivity
 People who take health seriosuly
 People with food allergy family history 
 Children under age 5
 Adults over age 30
 People w/o allergy/sensitivity (maybe)
 What
 To make it easier to adapt to dietary restrictions
 To make people/families more knowledgeable on the subject
 To make it easier to find a gastroenterologist
 Stop/contain/resolve food allergies or sensitivities 
  
 Why
 Sometimes it is hard to pin point symptoms as symptoms of food allergy
 Allergies/sensitivities are becoming more common
 Digestive system/properties can change during body growth and development
  Seen as more of an "option" and not necessary if one does not have an allergy/symptoms

4 comments:

  1. Hi Lauren,
    I was very interested in your "what" section. I feel as though a good point was brought up. Allergies can change and develop as we age so maybe testing when we are younger defeats the purpose? I think that allergy testing is a good idea and a great opportunity, however maybe you should think about testing multiple times. With further research you could see how often the body changes and develops and come up with the right amount of time to wait between each test!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This post has been my favorite so far. I like how you showed that allergies can change, disappear, and appear overtime. Generally people believe that they cant just show up out of nowhere, or just disappear and I am glad that some people do see this. But the problem I see with testing only when older is children are more likely to have greater health risks like anaphylactic shock, when consuming something of allergen. Therefore I believe test should be done once a child begins consuming normal food (not baby food,) and then about every 7-10 years thereafter, so as you mentioned in your last post, people don't find out their allergic to something by going into anaphylactic shock.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Lauren,
    I can tell that you spent a significant amount of time considering the potential benefits and implications of your idea. Additionally, I believe that the opinions expressed in the interviews you conducted will be very helpful in revealing where your target audience is. As someone who has been affected by cat, pollen and dust allergies, I spent a great deal of my life unaware of these allergies. Finally having an allergy test 2 years ago was a crucial experience for me, allowing me to finally understand what things were affecting my health so negatively.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lauran, during this assignment I really struggled to find people that fell outside of my boundary when it came to my opportunity. Everyone that I interview either loved the idea or felt that it was a good idea that they didn't think they could use. I considered them on the fence because I feel like once I get my app going they will no longer be on the fence.

    ReplyDelete